Cursor vs Windsurf
Choosing between Cursor and Windsurf in developer tools? This page compares pricing, ratings, integrations, and headline features so UK buyers can decide faster. On combined rating and review volume, Cursor currently edges ahead — still verify fit against your stack.
What Cursor is
Cursor is a VS Code-based AI coding IDE for multi-file edits, agent/composer workflows, and cloud agents. Public individual plans (Aug 2026): free Hobby, Pro $20/mo, Pro+ $60/mo, Ultra $200/mo, plus Teams at $40/user/mo. Strong fit for engineering teams that want deeper agentic coding than line-completion alone — with review, tests, and secrets hygiene before merging agent output.
Pricing signal: Free / Pro $20/mo / Pro+ $60 / Ultra $200 · Verified listing
What Windsurf is
Windsurf (by Codeium) is a VS Code-compatible AI IDE with Cascade agentic multi-step coding, fast codebase retrieval, and multi-model support. Teams pick it for agentic editing with simpler pricing than some credit-heavy rivals. Still review agent diffs and tests before merge — same discipline as any AI IDE.
Pricing signal: Free / from $15/mo · Verified listing
AI-first IDE for multi-file agents, completions, and cloud coding
AI IDE with Cascade agents — a strong Cursor alternative
At a glance
| Field | Cursor | Windsurf |
|---|---|---|
| tagline | AI-first IDE for multi-file agents, completions, and cloud coding | AI IDE with Cascade agents — a strong Cursor alternative |
| priceLabel | Free / Pro $20/mo / Pro+ $60 / Ultra $200 | Free / from $15/mo |
| Rating | 4.7 (14,200 reviews) | 4.6 (6,800 reviews) |
| Verified |
Integrations
Feature differences
Headline capabilities from each catalogue listing. Overlap means both claim the capability; exclusive rows are where the products diverge for buyers shortlisting developer tools.
- No identical feature strings listed
- Agent and Composer multi-file coding
- Full codebase context indexing
- Cloud agents and background runs
- Tab completions and inline edits
- MCP, skills, and hooks on supported plans
- Bugbot / review helpers on higher tiers
- Cascade agentic mode for multi-file coding tasks
- Codebase-aware completions and edits
- Fast context retrieval across large repos
- Multi-model support alongside Windsurf models
- Inline completions and command palette AI
- GitHub/GitLab workflow fit for teams
Who should choose which?
Pick Cursor if…
- You want aI-first IDE for multi-file agents, completions, and cloud coding
- You specifically need: Agent and Composer multi-file coding
- Your stack already includes Slack, Figma
- You prefer the more widely reviewed option (14,200 reviews)
Pick Windsurf if…
- You want aI IDE with Cascade agents — a strong Cursor alternative
- You specifically need: Cascade agentic mode for multi-file coding tasks
- Your stack already includes Jira
This is a catalogue comparison for shortlisting, not a paid endorsement. Always confirm current pricing and security claims on the vendor site before buying.
Need to compare more?
Build a 3-way comparison with the full feature breakdown, or see alternatives to either app.
From marketplace to working ops
Need help implementing Cursor vs Windsurf?
Choosing the tool is the easy part. We help UK service businesses map the workflow, connect systems, set approval gates, and roll out without a stalled pilot. Independent advice — we are not the vendor.
- ·Shortlist and fit for your process
- ·Integration and data handoff plan
- ·Human approval where it matters
- ·Clear next step after the call